Monday, September 14, 2020

SURVEY OF REVELATION 19:11-16

 Chapter 19 is divided as follows.

  1. 19:1-5--Continuation of the chapter 18 as heaven rejoices over the destruction of Babylon; this was discussed in a previous post

  2. 19:6-10--Announcements of the marriage of the Lamb and marriage supper of the Lamb

  3. 19:11-21--The great battle (probably “Armageddon”) between the Lamb and the Beast:  I shall discuss the first 6 verses of this passage


I describe 19:11-21 as “The Great Battle.”  However, the battle is hardly described.  The main focus is on the “one sitting” on a white horse.  Some conclusions seem pretty obvious from the first few verses of the passage.  The conclusions are 

  • The rider on the white horse is Jesus Christ

  • He is moving from the sphere of heaven to the sphere of earth

  • He will be triumphant

VERSE 19:11:  “Then I saw…”  Throughout Revelation John SEES things.  We are reminded again and again that John had a long series of visions.  These were revelations of the present (John’s present) and the future.  “Revelation” is the English translation of the Greek “Apocalypsis,” which is the first word in the book.  The book begins:  “The revelation of Jesus Christ…”  These revelations are, I believe, a heavenly--or, one might say, a spiritual--perspective of what was occurring or will occur. How those events might be perceived by humans on earth is not always clear.  

Today we are in a “pandemic,” a world-wide epidemic of the coronavirus or COVID-19.  We are perceiving these events in terms of a virus that brings about a disease that may be asymptomatic, mildly discomfiting, or horrific in consequence, even fatal.  It has possibly affected every nation on earth, with varying intensity.  In the United States it is the main topic of the network evening news every night.  What is the spiritual dimension of this pandemic?  How does heaven perceive it?  I would not claim to know, but I would dare to make some generalizations.  I think that this disease has had several consequences and created several questions:

  • The disease has demanded that it be taken seriously.  There have been many who have tried to call it a hoax or of little consequence, but the death tolls continue to rise to the point that no one can ignore it.

  • The disease has become a political issue in the United State.  It has tested leaders from the local, state, and federal levels and forced them to make decisions.  

  • The disease has brought death to many.  Death of a loved one is always a spiritual crisis of greater or lesser degree.

  • The disease has challenged the medical community to find within themselves courage, stamina, leadership, and wisdom.

  • The disease has forced ordinary citizens to decide what their reactions will be.  Will they wear a mask, “socially distance,” obey stay at home orders, practice good hygiene?  Will they go to parties and concerts and bars where they run the risk of infection?  Will they react with anger at others who have made opposite decisions to their own--yelling at someone wearing a mask or yelling at someone demanding that they wear a mask?

  • The disease has brought financial crisis to many.  Many have lost their jobs and, although they may have received government aid, they have been unable to meet all of their expenses.

  • In all of these crises, persons have been confronted with their own faith or lack of faith.  They have either been driven to humble repentance and deep prayer for themselves, their families and friends, and their country, or they have cursed the virus and what it is doing to life as they once knew it.  As with all of life and its vicissitudes, the human heart has been tested.  The Lord God knows our hearts, but He uses these kinds of events to make manifest the secrets of our hearts.  

  • Did God send the coronavirus?  I believe God allowed the pandemic to take place in order that our hearts might be tested.  So, while we have simply observed the story of the pandemic from an earthly perspective, heaven has seen the spiritual consequences.


John sees a vision, and it begins with “heaven, which has been opened…”  Heaven, which we think of as a place far away and far above, is opened up in order to unveil who and what is coming next.   A young man told me about how he believed that he confused a preacher by asking about how heaven can be up on opposite sides of the earth.  The answer, I believe, is that heaven is not “up,” it’s sideways.  By that I mean that it is another dimension (or set of dimensions) that do not conform to our ideas of up and down.  So heaven may be right beside you.  So, when heaven opened, it did not reveal Jesus riding down a rainbow onto earth.  It simply revealed Jesus, present and ready to conquer.  

John sees a white horse and its rider.  The focus is on the rider.  Two sets of descriptors are linked together.  First, He “is called faithful and true.”  Second, “in righteousness he judges and makes war.”  This is a power moment for this rider.  He is about to make war and to judge.  But what He does is connected to what He is.  He is faithful and true.  His character guides His actions.  I think it is also significant to note that His act of judgement precedes His act of making war.  So, I think we can discern the following sequence:  His character is to be faithful and true.  Therefore in righteousness He judges.  As a consequence of His judgment, He makes war.  This is a holy war upon unholy people who have temporarily dominated the earth.  Now, the Deliverer is coming to end that domination.

VERSE 19:12:  The rider has eyes “like a flame of fire.”  This description is also found in Revelation 1:14.  In that passage, the person whom John saw seemed to have a more priestly function compared to the function of deliverance, ruling, and judgment that is described in chapter 19.  Nevertheless, some of that earlier vision is duplicated--enough to give us confidence that both passages describe the same person.

The rider is crowned with many diadems.  A diadem was the crown worn by the Persian rulers.  It consisted of a tiara of metal adorned with a blue and white strip called the fillet.  It was the sign of royalty.  The other kind of crown in the New Testament is the stephanos, which was a wreath that was given to the winner of a race.  It is the sign of achievement.  Thus, the rider is displaying his legitimacy as royalty by wearing many diadems.  The only other use of “diadem” is in the descriptions of the Dragon in Revelation 12:3 and of the Beast in 13:1.  The Dragon had seven heads and seven diadems.  The Beast had seven heads and ten horns.  It had a diadem on each of the ten horns.

The rider has a name, but only He knows that name.  According to Leon Morris:  “Those who practised [sic] magic in the first century believed that to know a name gave power over him whose name it was.  John may well be saying that no-one has power over Christ.  He is supreme.  His name is known only to Himself.” (Morris, 230) 

VERSE 19:13:  The rider has a robed dipped in blood.  Does this represent His own blood, shed on the cross, or does it represent the blood of His enemies which He spills in battle?  The former is probably correct, but the latter may also be implied.  Is it possible that the two are intertwined, that Jesus spilled His blood in atonement to save those whose blood will be spilled at Armageddon?  Incidentally, this raises the question of the universal versus the limited atonement.  Arminianists believe that Christ died for all, but not all receive that atonement by faith.  Calvinists believe that Christ died only for the elect, all of whom receive the atonement by faith.  I believe in the universal atonement.  Note that the universal atonement is not equivalent to universal salvation.  

In contrast to verse 19:12, verse 19:13 reveals a name of the rider.  I use “a” rather than “the” as the article, but the verse uses “the.”  We could interpret this two ways.  First, we could understand that “a” is implied.  This means that this name that is revealed is one of several alternative names by which the rider is known.  To get ahead of the story, we know that this person is Jesus Christ.  And He is known by more than one name.  We could name at least the following:  Jesus Christ, Christ Jesus, Jesus of Nazareth, the Second Person of the Trinity, the Son of God, the Son, the Word, the Logos, the Word of God, and probably several others.  Some function more as titles, some more as descriptors, and some more as names, but all could be called names.  So, it is appropriate to understand that this name--the Word of God--is “a” name for the rider.  That would mean that there is no contradiction of this part of verse 19:13 and the latter part of 19:12.

Another interpretation is that “the” name that is revealed in 19:13 is the name referred to in 19:12.  John is revealing that name which no one knows.  I do not think that is a likely explanation.  I have listed a large number of names by which Jesus Christ is known.  So, the facts--that “the Word of God” is one of those names and that there is one name that only He knows--fit the understanding that there are several names that are applied to Jesus.  That one that only Jesus knows will remain a secret.

I took a side trip and now I’m back to the more important business of considering this amazing name of Jesus:  the Word of God.  This term and the ideas behind it are especially important in the writings of John.  The prologue to John’s gospel (John 1:1-5) focuses on the Word.  We have the following information:

  • The Word was in the beginning.

  • The Word was with God.

  • The Word was God.

  • We combine the first two statements: He was in the beginning with God.

  • All things came into being through Him.

  • Life (zoe) was in Him.

  • This life gave light to people.

  • That light shined in darkness, which could not overcome it.

Here is some of the most amazing information that is known.  In the words of the hippies, it blows your mind.  We are given information about a person who was both with God and was God.  When everything started, He was already there.  Creation took place “through Him.”  He was the instrument of creation.  He had the life of God in Him.  That life is a beacon of hope and a revelation of the truth about God.  The light that came from that light cannot be overcome by the darkness of the world.

That is the background that prepares us for the punch line of John 1, which is in verse 1:14:  “And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us…”  The blowing of our minds continues.  Not only are we introduced to this amazing person--the Word--but also we are informed that that Word has become human (which is what “flesh” means in this context).  As we continue to read the Gospel of John, we soon figure out that this Word who became human is one and the same Jesus of Nazareth.  Notice that:  a man who came from the town of Nazareth, a carpenter who went to synagogue school and had brothers and sisters, who ate and drank and went to the bathroom (pardon the familiarity, but it is just true)--this Jesus was the Word of God.  

The mind-blowing goes on.  In the fourth chapter of John, Jesus talks with the Samaritan woman and tells her (John 4:14):  “...whoever drinks of the water that I will give him will never be thirsty again.  The water that I will give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life.”  There are two words for “life” in the New Testament.  The word used here and in John 1:4 is zoe.  It is used in some cases to mean ordinary physical life, but it also is used in the New Testament to represent a unique kind of life.  This is how Arndt and Gingrich, in their dictionary, describe it:  “the supernatural life belonging to God and Christ, which the believers will receive in the future, but which they also enjoy here and now.”  

So, observe three “movements,” if you will:  The Word was in the beginning and He had zoe in Him.  The Word became human and dwelt among us.  The Word can impart to people the zoe that is in Him.  

It is this Word of God who is now riding on a white horse coming out of heaven into the midst of human affairs.  No longer does He sit next to the Father on the throne (see Psalm 110:1ff).  He has come to vanquish His enemies, which are also the enemies of those who love and follow Him.  Because He has been in the business of imparting eternal zoe to people for over 2000 years--life that cost Him His own life on the cross, now He has earned the right to reign over the nations.  That reign will be in “real time,” on earth, visible to all.

VERSE 19:14:  Behind the Word, riding white horses just as He does, are the “armies of heaven.”  They dressed in fine, white, pure linen.  So, now we have a mystery to be solved:  who constitute these “armies of heaven”?  I propose three answers:

  1. These armies are people who are saved and resurrected or raptured, either the New Testament church or the New Testament church plus the Old Testament saints.

  2. These armies are angels.

  3. These armies are a combination of 1 and 2.

The evidence for answer number 1 would be the description of their clothing of fine, white, pure linen.  This would reflect back to verse 19:8, in which the clothing of the Bride is described in the same way.  

However, angels are sometimes described as wearing white or referred to as a “host” (army) or as constituting legions (military units).  See the following descriptions of angels:  

  • Wearing white:  Matthew 28:2-3, John 20:12, Acts 1:10, Revelation 15:16  

  • Referred to as “host” or as constituting legions or as engaging in spiritual warfare:  Luke 2:13, Matthew 26:53, Revelation 12:7

There are also declarations that angels will accompany Jesus at His Second Coming and that they will be engaged in warfare.  See Matthew 25:31 and II Thessalonians 1:5-7.  But it is also true that the resurrected and raptured saints will accompany Jesus at His Second Coming.  See I Thessalonians 4:13-18.  

As I consider the evidence, it seems to me that the army of troops with Jesus may be a combination of angels and resurrected people.  These people are the same ones who are identified as the Bride of Christ in 19:7-8.  It seems odd to us that a bride would join her groom in a battle on her wedding day (assuming that this is indeed her wedding day).  But Revelation is an odd book.  

VERSE 19:15:  Next, we have a further description of the lead rider:  He has a sharp sword coming from His mouth.  I have seen cartoon-like drawings from the time of Luther that depict Christ with a stack of crowns on His head and a sword protruding from His mouth.  (These were “cartoon-like,” but they were not meant to denigrate Christ.)  This is a precise depiction of the wording in this chapter.  Note the significant associations in this verse (19:15)

First, the sword is mentioned in the first chapter of Revelation (1:16).  In the earlier description, the sword is two-edged.  The description in 19:15 perhaps uses the sword to help the reader identify the rider on the white horse with the “Son of Man” (1:13) of chapter 1, just as the mention of “eyes...like a flame of fire” also refers back to the same description in 1:12-16.  This sword is also mentioned in Revelation 2:12 and 16.  In this latter reference, Jesus warns that He will fight against false teachers with this sword.  Now, in 19:15, the same sword will strike down nations.  We also must keep in mind that the word of God is “sharper than any two-edged sword” (Hebrews 4:12).  Thus, this sword, which comes out of the mouth of the rider, is the word of God which is spoken in power to destroy the mightiest army.   

Then, there is the mention of the “rod of iron” with which the rider will rule the nations.  This idea is first mentioned in the Messianic Psalm 2:7-9:

“I will tell of the decree:  The Lord said to me, “You are my Son; today I have begotten you.  Ask of me, and I will make the nations your heritage and the ends of the earth your possession.  You shall break [LXX rule] them with a rod of iron and dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.”  It is also mentioned in the letter to the church at Thyatira, in the Lord’s message to those who do not hold the teaching of “Jezebel,” a false prophetess.  Those who “conquer”--that is, withstand the environment of sin and deception in the church--are promised “authority over the nations” and the power to “rule them with a rod of iron…” (Revelation 2:27)  In Revelation 12:5, the male child, who is born to the special woman “clothed with the sun…” (12:1), is identified as “one who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron.”  So, the phrase “rod of iron” is a pregnant phrase reminding the reader of the destiny of Messiah and, as it is used in Revelation 2:27, signalling to the reader the amazing share in the rulership that is to be granted to the faithful disciple.  Now, in 19:15, the expression serves to identify the rider on the white horse as none other than the Messiah.     

Finally, one other allusion is employed in 19:15:  It is said of the rider on the white horse:  “He will tread the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty.”  This refers back to Revelation 14:14-20.  In that passage, two harvests are depicted.  In one, 14:14-16, Christ uses a sickle to harvest the earth.  It is not specified what kind of harvest he reaps.  However, no details such as those in the second harvest are given.  It seems natural to assume that this is a harvest of people for the Lord.  Verses 14:14-16 reflect back to John 4:35:  “Do you not say, there are yet four months , then comes the harvest.”   

In Revelation 14:17-20, a second harvest is depicted.  This time, grapes are harvest.  The grapes are thrown into the “great winepress of the wrath of God.”  These grapes are trod “outside the city, and the blood flowed from the winepress, as high as a horse’s bridle for 1,600 stadia [about 184 miles according to ESVSB].”  In Revelation 19:15, the rider on the white horse “will tread the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty.”  There seems to be a direct connection between the “harvest” of wrath in 14:17-20 and the action of the rider on the white horse in 19:15.  We also can make a connection between the “robe dipped in blood” in 19:13 and the obviously bloody trampling of the grapes of wrath.  [I have noted in another post the uses made of these vivid word pictures:  The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck and the reference in “The Battle Hymn of the Republic” by Julia Ward Howe to “trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored.]  Finally, we find an Old Testament parallel in Isaiah 63:1-6 (thanks to Bible Gateway):

Who is this who comes from Edom,

    in crimsoned garments from Bozrah,

he who is splendid in his apparel,

    marching in the greatness of his strength?

“It is I, speaking in righteousness,

    mighty to save.”

Why is your apparel red,

    and your garments like his who treads in the winepress?

“I have trodden the winepress alone,

    and from the peoples no one was with me;

I trod them in my anger

    and trampled them in my wrath;

their lifeblood spattered on my garments,

    and stained all my apparel.

For the day of vengeance was in my heart,

    and my year of redemption had come.

I looked, but there was no one to help;

    I was appalled, but there was no one to uphold;

so my own arm brought me salvation,

    and my wrath upheld me.

I trampled down the peoples in my anger;

    I made them drunk in my wrath,

    and I poured out their lifeblood on the earth.”

VERSE 19:16:  Twice on His person is a name written:  “King of kings and Lord of lords.”  Notice the multiplicity of identifications of this rider:

  • Faithful and true (19:11)

  • A name that no one but He knows (19:12)

  • The Word of God (19:13)

  • King of kings and Lord of lords (19:16)

This person is greater than any single name can encapsulate.  We find in these names character, mystery, the full expression of God, royal majesty, nobility.  As He rides into the scene of human cruelty, domination, perversion, deception, hate, fear, madness, frailty, and need, He comes to destroy the enemies of the human soul and to establish true shalom.  He does not come to carry out any particular vengeance harbored in any particular heart.  For human vengeance is selfish and short-sighted.  He does not come to trample out the grapes of the wrath of people.  For human wrath comes out of ignorance and disobedience and impatience.  He comes to avenge the injustices that plague the weak, the widow and the orphan.  He comes to trample the grapes of God’s wrath against every sort of sin and hate and injustice.  

In these days of Black Lives Matter and COVID-19, we humans are pointing fingers and demanding retribution, but we do so with eyes that do not know the full picture.  It is not that racial injustice must be ignored or pushed off to the side.  It is simply that all of us must meet injustice with a deep sense of humility and recognition that we do not know all the answers.  We must recognize that ultimately God is our hope for racial justice and deliverance from all of our enemies.  This is a time that calls for repentance and love.

REFERENCE:

Crossway Books.  English Standard Version Study Bible. Good News Publishers, 2007.


Sunday, August 9, 2020

SURVEY OF REVELATION 19:6-10

(Except when another version is noted, Bible quotations are from English Standard Version, ESV.)


Chapter 19 is divided as follows.

  1. 19:1-5--Continuation of the chapter 18 as heaven rejoices over the destruction of Babylon; this was discussed in a previous post

  2. 19:6-10--Announcements of the marriage of the Lamb and marriage supper of the Lamb

  3. 19:11-21--The great battle (probably “Armageddon”) between the Lamb and the Beast

I shall focus only on part 2 (19:6-10) in this post.

THE CALL TO PRAISE FOR THE REIGN OF GOD (VERSE 19:6)

Verse 19:6 begins almost exactly as verse 19:1 as John hears an extremely loud sound from heaven.  He describes it in three ways--a great multitude, a roar of many waters (like a waterfall or “white water” river), “mighty peals of thunder.”  These sounds are sounds of rejoicing.  Arrowhead Stadium is home of the Kansas City Chiefs National Football League (NFL) team.  The crowd at that stadium once held the record as the loudest crowd in the NFL at 142.2 decibels.  This exceeds the noise of a stock car race, a loud rock concert, a siren at 100 feet.  That’s loud, but perhaps heaven’s rejoicing was even louder!

The rejoicing is for two reasons:  the Lord reigns and the marriage of the Lamb has come.  

In one sense the Lord has always reigned, but in some ways that reign becomes more evident at certain times of human experience.  When the Lord pronounced creation to be “very good,” the Lord’s triumph was evident. (Genesis 1:31)  When the Lord defeated the Egyptians at the Red Sea, the Lord reigned triumphant.  (Exodus 14:30-31, see also 15:1-21)  When the Lord raised Jesus from the dead, the Lord exhibited his powerful reign.  (Matthew 28:1-10)  The Lord had just defeated Babylon, and the citizens of heaven rejoiced, and that rejoicing is described in 19:1-5.  So, when the statement is made, “For the Lord our God the Almighty reigns,” it is a reflection of the victory over Babylon.  But, because of its position in the text, it is evident that this rejoicing also is looking forward and not just on a recent victory.  

The tense of the verb “reigns” is aorist.  Aorist is a tricky tense.  Generally, the indicative aorist depicts past actions.  However, this example may be what is called the “gnomic aorist,” which is used for a generally universally-accepted truth.  (Brooks and Winbery, 101)  In that case, the present tense in translation is justified.  The following versions use the present tense:  King James, New American Standard Version, English Standard Version, New International Version, New Revised Standard Version.  In fact, I triple-checked to make sure it was aorist in the Greek.  So, the translators believe that the statement is not describing God’s action at a particular time, but at all times.  Eternally, God reigns.  

Because God reigns, the citizens of heaven encourage one another:  “Praise the Lord,” which is what “Hallelujah” means.

THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE MARRIAGE OF THE LAMB AND THE READINESS OF THE BRIDE (19:7-8)

The praise continues, but now for another reason:  “the marriage of the Lamb has come…”  This statement and the material that follows is a very difficult subject.  In 19:7-10, five subjects are addressed, as follows:

  1. The Marriage of the Lamb (19:7)

  2. The readiness of the Bride (19:8)

  3. The Marriage Supper of the Lamb (19:9)

  4. Those invited to the Marriage Supper (19:9)

  5. The rejection of worship by the angel (19:10)

Dispensationalists, at least from the view point of Pentecost (205, 226-228) understand the marriage of the Lamb and the Marriage Supper with the following ideas:

  1. The Bride of the Lamb is the (largely Gentile) church.

  2. The Marriage takes place in heaven before the Second Coming of Christ (after the Pre-tribulation Rapture).

  3. The Marriage Supper of the Lamb is “parabolic of the Millennium” (it is a parable for the Millennial period).

  4. Those who are invited to the Marriage Supper are, first, Israel, and, then, Gentiles who have survived the Tribulation period.

One of the central issues in Dispensationalism (which I am going to abbreviate to D in this post) is a sharp distinction between Israel and the church.  D considers the church as a “parenthesis” in the program of God.  The central program of God on earth is the Kingdom with Israel as its center.  The church is a “mystery”--a plan that God did not reveal in the Old Testament period, but only after Christ came.  When the church age is completed, then the church will be raptured from the earth, and God will begin to deal again with Israel and the Kingdom during the seven-year Tribulation period, at the Second Coming of Christ, and in the Millennial (1000-year) reign of Christ.  So, it is crucial to D that the church should get married to Christ in heaven, totally separated from Israel.  D insists that the people of the church are a “heavenly” people and that the people of the Kingdom, especially Israel, are of the earth.  (Pentecost, 193-218 and elsewhere)

I believe that this distinction is an inaccurate reading of Scripture.  I believe that the People of God are united in Christ.  See Ephesians 2:11-3:6 and my previous two posts, in which I discuss Dispensationalism.  In this post, I shall focus--or not--on the following:

  • The timing of the Marriage

  • The “fine linen” of the Bride

  • The Marriage Supper

  • Who is invited to the Supper

  • The forbidding of angel worship

THE TIMING OF THE MARRIAGE:  For those not immersed in these topics, focusing on these little matters, such as “when does the Lamb get married?” seem to be pursuits of the trivial.  The BIG ISSUE behind all this is the Pretribulation Rapture theory.  So, allow me to back up a bit and explain.  

    D has taught for years that the Second Coming of Christ is in two stages.  First, there will be a rapture of the church from earth to heaven.  Second, there will be a seven-year period of intense suffering called the Tribulation.  The Beast will reign during that time.  Third, Jesus will return to earth in the Second Coming.  He will defeat the Beast and set up a Kingdom, with headquarters in Jerusalem, and He will reign for a thousand years (the Millennium).  

    Thus, the marriage of the Lamb to His Bride, which is the church, will take place in heaven between the Rapture and the Second Coming.  Therefore, D takes the announcement of the wedding of the Lamb BEFORE the great battle (19:11ff) as proof that the church is in heaven during the Tribulation.  

    I do not agree with the Pretribulation Rapture theory.  So, how can I account for the position of the announcement in the narrative?  In fact, it is a common feature of Revelation to insert announcements “proleptically” (as though a future event has already or is about to happen).  

  • So, for example, there are two announcements of the destruction of Babylon (14:8 and 16:19) before Babylon is focused on in 17 and 18.  

  • Moreover, 17:16 announces the destruction of Babylon and then 18 describes the destruction in more detail.  

  • Similarly, the career of the Beast is described in chapter 13, but then is described from another viewpoint in parts of chapter 17.  

  • Armageddon is mentioned in chapter 16:16 as a component of the sixth bowl of wrath.  This mention of Armageddon is before the mention of the destruction of Babylon in 16:19 as a component of the seventh bowl of wrath.  

  • On the other hand, the destruction of Babylon is detailed in chapters 17:1-19:5 before the description of the battle, which seems to be Armageddon, in 19:11ff.  

  • The Marriage Supper of the Lamb is announced in 19:9.  It is not clear whether it is part of the announcement of the Marriage of the Lamb.  If the Supper is considered a separate event and is equivalent to the Millennium, then this announcement is also “proleptic.”  One could argue that 19:9 rules out the equivalency of the Supper and Millennium or could make other conjectures.  The point is that the position of this announcement in the narrative rules against any conclusion about the Marriage announcement in 19:7.  

  • Finally, the Bride is described as equivalent to the New Jerusalem in 21:2 and 21:9ff, and it is ambiguous whether the Bride is one about to be married or already has been married.

THE “FINE LINEN” OF THE BRIDE:  In 19:8, the Bride is said to wear “fine linen” and this linen is “the righteous deeds of the saints.”  Pentecost believes that this is evidence that the the “marriage…[follows] the events of the bema of Christ.” Pentecost, 227)  The “bema” was a place of judgment, usually where the judge sat.  See John 19:13, where Pilate sits on the bema.   In Romans 14:10 Paul asks why the Christians pass judgment on their brothers, because we will all “stand before the judgment seat of God.” In II Corinthian 5.10 we find that we shall all appear before the judgment seat of Christ to receive what is due us for what we have done in the body.  

So, “when the wife appears she appears in the ‘righteousness of the saints’ (Rev. 19:8), which can only refer to those things that have been accepted at the the judgment seat of Christ.  Thus the marriage itself must be placed between the judgment seat of Christ and the second advent.”  (Pentecost, 227)    

This view of the bema judgment--as a sort of purging of the church, almost like a purgatory--needs to be understood with caution.  Paul, in Ephesians 5:25-27, describes how Christ Himself, by His death, sanctified the church so that he might “present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish.”   In II Corinthians 11:2, Paul is concerned about the church at Corinth as it is being influenced by false apostles.  These teachers came from Jerusalem to exert authority over the Corinthian church, supposedly in the name of the Jerusalem apostles.  But Paul recognized that they were opportunists and would endanger the church to false doctrine.  So, he exerted apostolic authority to bring the church back to the gospel of Christ in order to present it “as a pure virgin to Christ.”  In II Corinthians 6:14-7:1, Paul describes how the individual members of the church, as well as the church as a body--the temple of God--should be holy, living “separately” from the corruption of the world.  In these instances, the church is not viewed as needing purging, but is experiencing purification in this present life.

THE MARRIAGE SUPPER AND WHO IS INVITED:  At this point, I am going to “punt” on these topics.  They are certainly important, but I believe that they should be considered in conjunction with a discussion of the Millennium.

THE FORBIDDING OF ANGEL WORSHIP:  “The angel” has spoken concerning the marriage supper and comments that “These are the true words of God.”  (19:9)  John responds by preparing to worship the angel.  However, the angel forbids him, and then comments:  “I am a fellow servant with you and your brothers who hold to the testimony of Jesus.  Worship God.  For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophesy.”  (19:10)

    The angel puts himself on the same level as John.  He is a fellow servant with John and his “brothers.”  Our knowledge of angels is very limited.  Almost all of the descriptions of angels in the Scripture describe them as having much greater abilities, position, and knowledge than ourselves.  

  • An angel went up in a flame of fire.  (Judges 13:20)

  • An angel caused fire to consume a sacrifice. (Judges 6:21)

  • An angel cleansed Isaiah’s lips with a burning coal.  (Isaiah 6:7)

  • An angel announced the coming birth of Jesus.  Luke (1:30-31)

  • An angel rolled the stone from the tomb.  (Matthew 28:2)

  • An angel locked Satan in the Abyss.  (Revelation 20:1-3)

However, the message of this angel is that he and John share the same task and purpose:  they labor together as servants of God.  

The angel includes himself among other servants, the “brothers” of John.  This could include all Christians, but it seems especially to focus on those “who hold to the testimony of Jesus.”  Although “hold to” (ESV) is a possible translation of the word,  which is most simply translated as “have,” there are a number of possible meanings.  The “verb” is actually a present participle which can be translated as part of a dependent clause modifying John and the “brothers.” I believe the connection of the verb with “testimony” implies the meaning “to testify.”  The present tense implies continuous action.  Hence, the best meaning seems to be “who continue consistently to testify about Jesus.”  The angel is a fellow servant of those who consistently testify about Jesus.

Having forbidden John’s angel worship, the angel clarifies his meaning by simply saying “worship God.”  There was an angel fad that went around about 15 years ago.  People put angel figurines everywhere.  It was part of the folk religion that passes off as Christianity.  It does seem to have died down.

    The final statement in this passage (19:6-10) is a mind-blower:  “For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.”  The “for” is in reference to “Worship God.”  The connection is as follows:

Cause:  “the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.”

Result:  “Worship God.”

We have two problems:  to understand the cause and to understand how the cause brings about worship of God.

How is the testimony of Jesus the spirit of prophecy?  I believe that a “low” understanding of how “spirit” is used is merited.  By “low” understanding, I mean that “spirit” is not referring directly to the Holy Spirit nor to other spiritual beings.  I believe that “spirit” here refers to the state of mind or disposition.  (One possible meaning of pneuma in Arndt and Gingrich.)  See I Corinthians 4:21 and I Peter 3:4 where pneuma is used in this way.  This use of “spirit” is also found in the Old Testament.  See Numbers 5:14, Judges 15:19, I Samuel 1:15, etc.  So, the “spirit” from which prophecy comes is a disposition to testify concerning Jesus.  JESUS IS AT THE CENTER OF ALL PROPHECY.  

How does the fact that Jesus is the center of all prophecy lead to or entail worshiping God?  The testimony concerning Jesus is that He is the  centerpiece of the plan of God to bring about redemption, reconciliation, and salvation of the human race.  “[In] Christ God was reconciling the world to himself…” Thus, we have the following series of causes and effects:  the desire or disposition to testify concerning Jesus (the spirit of prophecy)→ prophetic revelation about Jesus (prophecy) → belief and salvation → a new relationship with God that leads naturally to a life of worship of God (worship of God).  

These brief clauses (“Worship God” and “the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy”) remind us of the following about prophecy:

  • It is not a branch of Scripture that is separate from the central message of God’s redeeming work.

  • It is not an esoteric set of interlocking puzzles that must be solved to unlock some secrets of the universe. 

We are also reminded that 

  • Prophecy is part of the testimony about Jesus.

  • Prophecy reveals components of God’s redeeming work.

Prophecy is difficult to study and full of possible pitfalls.  It puts many people off and confuses some and has been the occasion for a number of cults and other forms of deception.  Nevertheless, it is an important part of the revelation of God.  Ultimately, our study of it should bring about a deep appreciation for who Jesus is, what He has done, and what He is about to do.  From that appreciation should flow a praise of God.

REFERENCES:

Arndt, William F. and F. Wilbur Gingrich.  A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature.  Chicago:  The University of Chicago Press, 1957.

Brooks, James A. and Carlton Winbery.  Syntax of New Testament Greek. Lanham, MD:  University Press of America, 1979.

Crossway Books.  English Standard Version Study Bible. Good News Publishers, 2007.

Pentecost, J. Dwight.  Things to Come.  Grand Rapids:  Zondervan Publ., 1958.